Hi Carsten,
dedicatedcomputer.ca/test
Please examine the license terms on riscv_pal.h
If I supply this file it doesn't mean I give up my rights under this
license.
Sometimes this freeness is not always on equal terms. Some will take
advantage.

Again this is meant a friendly exchange of thoughts,
Regards,
John S


On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 1:17 AM Carsten Strotmann via Amforth-devel <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> On 10 Feb 2026, at 19:59, John Sarabacha wrote:
>
> > Hi Carsten,
> > Question now is can riscv_pal.h with its licensing be
> > embodied in a AmForth work which is GPLv3?
>
> I haven't seen the code, as you did not provided a download link to the
> code.
>
> I can only speculate how riscv_pal.h is related to amForth.
>
> > Is riscv_pal.h forced to be GPLv3 also, my licensing no longer applies?
>
> My view: if riscv_pal.h is being used within amForth, it will be GPLv3
> licensed and other (more permissive or more restrictive) licensing will not
> apply.
>
> > Who is benefiting here, lawyers (they have enough money) or developers?
>
> Developers are benefiting. No doubt. I work in the space of what is called
> "open source software" since 1988, and I've seen some cases where companies
> have exploited permissive software licensing (MIT, BSD, ISC), making a lot
> of money with products and sharing neither code, nor money nor maintenance
> work with the original developer(s).
>
> These developers have switched the licenses of their code from permissive
> licensing to copyleft licensing.
>
> Examples are the products of ISC (BIND 9, Kea-DHCP).
>
> amForth is GPLv3 licensed, we all should respect that.
>
> > I don't mind sharing, it's the being forced to share I have an issue
> with.
>
> You are not forced to share. It is your choice to use amForth, nobody
> forces you. If you choose amForth, it is because you get something for
> free. If you get something for free, you should be willing to share on the
> same terms.
>
> Taking something for free and not sharing back is unethical, in my view.
>
> > When you do that you lose the freedom of expression (even if it is in
> > software).
> >
>
> You always have the choice to not touch any GPL licensed software. But if
> you choose to use GPL license software (like amForth), you must play by the
> rules of that license.
>
> The license situation of amForth is clear, I will not continue to discus
> this issue further.
>
> Carsten
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel

Reply via email to