We only need the additional IH rings for page fault handling or log handling and as far as I know that is incompatible with SRIOV for the moment. But Felix might have some more updates on this.
So as long as we don't support that under SRIOV we don't need this patch either.
Christian. Am 07.06.21 um 17:59 schrieb Khaire, Rohit:
[AMD Public Use] The hash is 5ea6f9c Rohit -----Original Message----- From: Koenig, Christian <[email protected]> Sent: June 7, 2021 11:58 AM To: Khaire, Rohit <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Deucher, Alexander <[email protected]>; Zhang, Hawking <[email protected]>; Deng, Emily <[email protected]>; Liu, Monk <[email protected]>; Zhou, Peng Ju <[email protected]>; Chen, Horace <[email protected]> Cc: Ming, Davis <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Use PSP to program IH_RB_CNTL_RING1/2 on SRIOV Do you have the hash for this commit? Thanks, Christian. Am 07.06.21 um 17:30 schrieb Khaire, Rohit:[AMD Public Use] We don't need RING1 and RING2 functionality for SRIOV afaik. But looking at the description of the original commit message it affects RING0 too? " drm/amdgpu: add timeout flush mechanism to update wptr for self interrupt (v2) outstanding log reaches threshold will trigger IH ring1/2's wptr reported, that will avoid generating interrupts to ring0 too frequent. But if ring1/2's wptr hasn't been increased for a long time, the outstanding log can't reach threshold so that driver can't get latest wptr info and miss some interrupts." Rohit -----Original Message----- From: Koenig, Christian <[email protected]> Sent: June 7, 2021 10:31 AM To: Khaire, Rohit <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Deucher, Alexander <[email protected]>; Zhang, Hawking <[email protected]>; Deng, Emily <[email protected]>; Liu, Monk <[email protected]>; Zhou, Peng Ju <[email protected]>; Chen, Horace <[email protected]> Cc: Ming, Davis <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Use PSP to program IH_RB_CNTL_RING1/2 on SRIOV Why are the ring 1&2 enabled on SRIOV in the first place? Christian. Am 07.06.21 um 16:23 schrieb Rohit Khaire:This is similar to IH_RB_CNTL programming in navi10_ih_toggle_ring_interrupts Signed-off-by: Rohit Khaire <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/navi10_ih.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/navi10_ih.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/navi10_ih.c index eac564e8dd52..e41188c04846 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/navi10_ih.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/navi10_ih.c @@ -120,11 +120,27 @@ force_update_wptr_for_self_int(struct amdgpu_device *adev, ih_rb_cntl = REG_SET_FIELD(ih_rb_cntl, IH_RB_CNTL_RING1, RB_USED_INT_THRESHOLD, threshold);- WREG32_SOC15(OSSSYS, 0, mmIH_RB_CNTL_RING1, ih_rb_cntl);+ if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) && amdgpu_sriov_reg_indirect_ih(adev)) { + if (psp_reg_program(&adev->psp, PSP_REG_IH_RB_CNTL_RING1, ih_rb_cntl)) { + DRM_ERROR("PSP program IH_RB_CNTL_RING1 failed!\n"); + return; + } + } else { + WREG32_SOC15(OSSSYS, 0, mmIH_RB_CNTL_RING1, ih_rb_cntl); + } + ih_rb_cntl = RREG32_SOC15(OSSSYS, 0, mmIH_RB_CNTL_RING2); ih_rb_cntl = REG_SET_FIELD(ih_rb_cntl, IH_RB_CNTL_RING2, RB_USED_INT_THRESHOLD, threshold); - WREG32_SOC15(OSSSYS, 0, mmIH_RB_CNTL_RING2, ih_rb_cntl); + if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) && amdgpu_sriov_reg_indirect_ih(adev)) { + if (psp_reg_program(&adev->psp, PSP_REG_IH_RB_CNTL_RING2, ih_rb_cntl)) { + DRM_ERROR("PSP program IH_RB_CNTL_RING2 failed!\n"); + return; + } + } else { + WREG32_SOC15(OSSSYS, 0, mmIH_RB_CNTL_RING2, ih_rb_cntl); + } + WREG32_SOC15(OSSSYS, 0, mmIH_CNTL2, ih_cntl); }
_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
