[AMD Public Use]

We don't need RING1 and RING2 functionality for SRIOV afaik.

But looking at the description of the original commit message it affects RING0 
too?

" drm/amdgpu: add timeout flush mechanism to update wptr for self interrupt (v2)

outstanding log reaches threshold will trigger IH ring1/2's wptr
reported, that will avoid generating interrupts to ring0 too frequent.
But if ring1/2's wptr hasn't been increased for a long time, the outstanding log
can't reach threshold so that driver can't get latest wptr info and
miss some interrupts."

Rohit

-----Original Message-----
From: Koenig, Christian <[email protected]> 
Sent: June 7, 2021 10:31 AM
To: Khaire, Rohit <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
Deucher, Alexander <[email protected]>; Zhang, Hawking 
<[email protected]>; Deng, Emily <[email protected]>; Liu, Monk 
<[email protected]>; Zhou, Peng Ju <[email protected]>; Chen, Horace 
<[email protected]>
Cc: Ming, Davis <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Use PSP to program IH_RB_CNTL_RING1/2 on SRIOV

Why are the ring 1&2 enabled on SRIOV in the first place?

Christian.

Am 07.06.21 um 16:23 schrieb Rohit Khaire:
> This is similar to IH_RB_CNTL programming in 
> navi10_ih_toggle_ring_interrupts
>
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Khaire <[email protected]>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/navi10_ih.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/navi10_ih.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/navi10_ih.c
> index eac564e8dd52..e41188c04846 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/navi10_ih.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/navi10_ih.c
> @@ -120,11 +120,27 @@ force_update_wptr_for_self_int(struct amdgpu_device 
> *adev,
>       ih_rb_cntl = REG_SET_FIELD(ih_rb_cntl, IH_RB_CNTL_RING1,
>                                  RB_USED_INT_THRESHOLD, threshold);
>   
> -     WREG32_SOC15(OSSSYS, 0, mmIH_RB_CNTL_RING1, ih_rb_cntl);
> +     if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) && amdgpu_sriov_reg_indirect_ih(adev)) {
> +             if (psp_reg_program(&adev->psp, PSP_REG_IH_RB_CNTL_RING1, 
> ih_rb_cntl)) {
> +                     DRM_ERROR("PSP program IH_RB_CNTL_RING1 failed!\n");
> +                     return;
> +             }
> +     } else {
> +             WREG32_SOC15(OSSSYS, 0, mmIH_RB_CNTL_RING1, ih_rb_cntl);
> +     }
> +
>       ih_rb_cntl = RREG32_SOC15(OSSSYS, 0, mmIH_RB_CNTL_RING2);
>       ih_rb_cntl = REG_SET_FIELD(ih_rb_cntl, IH_RB_CNTL_RING2,
>                                  RB_USED_INT_THRESHOLD, threshold);
> -     WREG32_SOC15(OSSSYS, 0, mmIH_RB_CNTL_RING2, ih_rb_cntl);
> +     if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) && amdgpu_sriov_reg_indirect_ih(adev)) {
> +             if (psp_reg_program(&adev->psp, PSP_REG_IH_RB_CNTL_RING2, 
> ih_rb_cntl)) {
> +                     DRM_ERROR("PSP program IH_RB_CNTL_RING2 failed!\n");
> +                     return;
> +             }
> +     } else {
> +             WREG32_SOC15(OSSSYS, 0, mmIH_RB_CNTL_RING2, ih_rb_cntl);
> +     }
> +
>       WREG32_SOC15(OSSSYS, 0, mmIH_CNTL2, ih_cntl);
>   }
>   
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to