[AMD Public Use]
If we have to improve the macro definition for repetitive loops, I assume we
can merge the two defines into one, like:
#define LOOP_UMC_CH_INST(umc_inst) for ((umc_inst) = 0; (umc_inst) <
adev->umc.umc_inst##_num; (umc_inst)++)
Then when we call the double loop, it can be done like:
LOOP_UMC_CH_INST(umc_inst)
LOOP_UMC_CH_INST(channel_inst) {...
Next we should name the macro more friendly.
Regards,
Guchun
From: Clements, John <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 3:28 PM
To: [email protected]; dl.srdc_lnx_ras <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: updated UMC error address record with correct
channel index
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
Resolved issue with inputting an incorrect UMC channel index into the UMC error
address record.
Defined macros for repetitive for loops
Thank you,
John Clements
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
