Am 15.06.2018 um 17:14 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 2018-06-15 05:11 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 15.06.2018 um 16:42 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
From: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>

Even BOs with AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_NO_CPU_ACCESS may end up at least
partially in CPU visible VRAM, in particular when all VRAM is visible.

Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--
   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
index 491fd0a789f7..9b34df7017f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
@@ -106,10 +106,32 @@ static u64 amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(struct
amdgpu_device *adev,
    */
   u64 amdgpu_vram_mgr_bo_invisible_size(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
   {
-    if (bo->flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_NO_CPU_ACCESS)
+    struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev);
+    struct amdgpu_vram_mgr *mgr = adev->mman.bdev.man[TTM_PL_VRAM].priv;
+    struct ttm_mem_reg *mem = &bo->tbo.mem;
+    struct drm_mm_node *nodes = mem->mm_node;
+    unsigned pages = mem->num_pages;
+    u64 usage = 0;
+
+    if (adev->gmc.visible_vram_size == adev->gmc.real_vram_size)
+        return 0;
Andrey just added a helper for that into amdgpu_gmc.h.
Yep, see patch 4 and the cover letter. :)

Yeah, seen that after hitting send :)

+
+    if (mem->start >= adev->gmc.visible_vram_size >> PAGE_SHIFT)
           return amdgpu_bo_size(bo);
   -    return 0;
+    if (!nodes)
+        return 0;
+
+    spin_lock(&mgr->lock);
I actually don't see any need to grab the lock here.
Ah, so amdgpu_vram_mgr_del only grabs it for drm_mm_remove_node?

Yes, exactly.

Christian.
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to