From: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>

At least in theory, ttm_bo_validate may move the BO, in which case the
pin_size accounting would be inconsistent with when the BO was pinned.

Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 18 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
index f5b0b180a6cc..210e7631f4b7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
@@ -969,15 +969,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_unpin(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
        bo->pin_count--;
        if (bo->pin_count)
                return 0;
-       for (i = 0; i < bo->placement.num_placement; i++) {
-               bo->placements[i].lpfn = 0;
-               bo->placements[i].flags &= ~TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT;
-       }
-       r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
-       if (unlikely(r)) {
-               dev_err(adev->dev, "%p validate failed for unpin\n", bo);
-               goto error;
-       }
 
        if (bo->tbo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) {
                adev->vram_pin_size -= amdgpu_bo_size(bo);
@@ -987,7 +978,14 @@ int amdgpu_bo_unpin(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
                adev->gart_pin_size -= amdgpu_bo_size(bo);
        }
 
-error:
+       for (i = 0; i < bo->placement.num_placement; i++) {
+               bo->placements[i].lpfn = 0;
+               bo->placements[i].flags &= ~TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT;
+       }
+       r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
+       if (unlikely(r))
+               dev_err(adev->dev, "%p validate failed for unpin\n", bo);
+
        return r;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to