* Alexander Wirt <[email protected]>: > Jo Rhett schrieb am Friday, den 01. February 2013: > > > On Feb 1, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Jo Rhett wrote: > > > On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:42 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > >> Or reliable filters under heavy load ;) > > > > > > > > > I keep hearing this argument, and every time I hear it I compare mail > > > statistics with the person who says that you can't filter during the > > > session and it turns out we process 5-10x the mail load that they do > > > (sometimes 20x or 100x), and we filter before queue. I believe that this > > > statement is due to misbelief and ignorance rather than real testing. > > > > Note that I don't have load testing experience with postfix yet, so that > > may be a problem. If so, I'll return to sendmail because I was previously > > doing this with a single-core 1.4ghz athlon processor and 2gb of RAM. So > > yeah, not much horsepower required. Recent system is 16gb 8 core, so if > > postfix can't keep up then it's the problem. > > > Trust me, we have more ram and more cores. And no postfix is never the > problem.
Content filter are ALWAYS the problem. It's cheap to do a SMTP session, but it cost a fortune to rip content apart and then turn over each bit just to tell its malware or not. p@rick -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Axel von der Ohe, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Joerg Heidrich
