On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > Agreed. I will expand the documentation as my time permits. There's good > reason to keep both approaches. Some countries don't see the need to do > pre-queue filtering; they have different ideas of a good [TM] content filter > policy.
You have three choices: 1. Backscatter bounced spam to (probably forged) senders 2. Don't tell senders that you discarded their e-mail 3. Reject during the SMTP session so the sender can be aware Normally, I'm a huge fan of "whatever works for you" but in this case there is no alternative. #1 and #2 are WRONG. #3 is only way to function well on the Internet. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.
