Hi Myriam, Valorie I am wondering.
Which of the many improvements suck? - The example biases which demonstrate to a novice user some of the features and are instantly usable? - The removal/merging of the three bias categories into one short list? - The simplification into a tree-widget that supports drag and drop and all the other stuff that users are already familiar with - The new "search" bias that allows to easily convert a search into a bias - Or some of the other smaller improvements or bug fixes? Anyway, as long as no-one could lay a finger on a concrete usability issue I will just continue bathing in the soft and sensual pink light of a job well done. Cheers, Ralf On Sa, 2011-06-04 at 12:00 +0200, amarok-devel-requ...@kde.org wrote: > Hi all, > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:21, Valorie Zimmerman > <valorie.zimmer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sucks. > > > > In a word. I find it unusable, and would rather see the old one back > > again, if this can't be made 1. discoverable and 2. accurate. > > I must agree, the usability sadly has not improved, it is still far > too nerdy and unsuitable for the average user. > > > Regards, Myriam _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
