John, your message reads like a Tom Clancy novel. As some know, many novels have the truth embedded in them.
This level of intrigue is totally above where my mind's at, but from your message I get the sense that whatever was decided is a done deal. I'll agree, there are numerous bad actors in this world exploiting AI. Only, they never see themselves as bad or good. They just do what most people do. They grab opportunity to profit. There's no in principle wrong with that, is there? All is relative. For example, many gangs offer drug activities as employment, even love and family safety. You see where I'm going with this? If "we" deploy AI for our needs, we have to do so to "profit" somehow. That is how all technology is deployed, for gain. I accept many entities gained from developing and deploying mass vaccines, crawlers, screenscrapers, eavesdroppers, secret recordings, etc. However, in the real world, this is how things are done, no good or bad attached to it. If I had my own LLM platform or agent, I'll know what I'll deploy it for. So do those who own, control and manipulate AI platforms. But, I don't, so I just do research to gain a broader understanding and maybe post a few thoughtful messages or papers. I don't get rewarded or paid for my contributions, but I profit by self actualization. You've just got to practice to become the best version of yourself. I don't feel obliged to be anyone's savior. The world doesn't expect that of me either. However, if you wanted to achieve an exceptional technical result and I could've helped somehow, I probably would've. On Sun, 11 Oct 2026, 14:30 John Rose via AGI, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Saturday, October 10, 2026, at 2:08 PM, Quan Tesla wrote: > > John, in a roundabout way that then returns us to your important > question: "Who's creating the cure for AI problems now?" The simplest > answer is; "we" are. "We" are also creating the AI-related problems. > > > I agree it’s “we” but the same game is played out over and over throughout > history. There are actors that are far better positioned than us that setup > the playing field in advance. The cure is decided beforehand it’s just a > matter of getting whatever virus identified and manipulating the public > into demanding the fix. Naturally things play out on the playing field, > participants do their thing, and that’s profited on. It’s mainly divide and > conquer. > > I’m US based so mostly see it from here. Their cure for AI issues is > programmable money, tokenization and mass surveillance. The Genius Act > passed in 2025 lays out a framework. Then that enables total control. > > This is what upsets people because many know how it works but they deserve > their privacy and human dignity. For example, there has been some success > on getting rid of Flock but that’s merely a decoy. > > We need surveillance, AI enables building high tech devices to the average > person and there are bad actors. But who are the real bad actors that > profit from sickness, death and destruction. That’s what most people miss > and are manipulated into defending their representative idols. The core bad > actors are untouchable, they hold the wealth and exotic secrets. We hope > some organically arisen bold tech leaders get us into a better position but > if they don't mostly fall in line they still get swapped out. > > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T25fb5a030fcfa28e-M0bec74bd637e1d1c71090aaa> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T25fb5a030fcfa28e-M30cd4b4c8bef0321b498627c Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
