Real estate isn't add easy as Trump males it look. Travis could attest i am sure.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017, 11:24 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > Did you notice how many of the inauguration photos have all the adults > looking at one thing (like Trump), and Barron looking at something > completely different (like Ivanka’s baby)? > > > > I hope they are raising that little rascal to be a normal kid, not a real > estate robot like his brothers. I’d like to think that’s what Melania is > doing, but maybe she’s a robot, too. Trump probably thinks Slovenia is the > 51st state. > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 31, 2017 10:00 AM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Or: Sally Yates > > > > Ignorance is the best argument against democracy, but the problem is every > alternative is worse. > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "Ken Hohhof" <*[email protected]* <[email protected]>> > > To: *[email protected]* <[email protected]> > > Sent: 1/31/2017 10:51:55 AM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Or: Sally Yates > > > > The problem with polling “the majority of the nation” is that’s defined as > “me and my Twitter followers”. So if you’re Wayne, the poll would include > you and Garth. > > > > If you want US policy to be guided by polls, first go to YouTube and watch > some clips from Jaywalking with Jay Leno. The average citizen can’t answer > questions like “where is the Panama Canal” or “name a country that borders > the US”. We’d be better off consulting the Magic 8 Ball. > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:*[email protected]* <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *That One Guy /sarcasm > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 31, 2017 9:34 AM > *To:* *[email protected]* <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Or: Sally Yates > > > > the insurance companies that participated in the "keep them calling in > until they give up" claims management schemes are a perfect example of that. > > I think the protests that are violating other peoples civil liberties > still in play follow suit. They havent been addressed because they maintain > the necessary chaos to keep the ranks of the enemy spread thin and its > beautiful. > > The majority of the nation supports the travel restrictions, its pissing > off the poll mongers too because no matter how they skew the data they cant > get it under 50 percent. Note the lack of polls, the stalwart of the left. > > keeping the "hes a puppet of <insert lackey>" mentality is great for > maintaining chaos, And I would be there is a PR mechanism in play keeping > that going > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Faisal Imtiaz <*[email protected]* > <[email protected]>> wrote: > > There are multiple theories about Chaos.... > > having said that.. there is also something called Orchestrated Chaos.. > > The most perfect Orchestrated Chaos would be one that can easily be > explained by 'simple incompetence'. > > > > While I am not a subscriber to conspiracy theories...but having worked > with the ILEC's and watched their behavior over a a couple of decades, it > is very hard for me to deny that there isn't something which is best > called Orchestrated Chaos, whose end results always somehow fall in favor > of the Orchestrator while simple explanations allow for the Orchestrator to > distance themselves from the responsibility .... > > > > > > Regards. > > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: *305 663 5518 x 232* <(305)%20663-5518> > > Help-desk: *(305)663-5518* <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email: > *[email protected]* <[email protected]> > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Adam Moffett" <*[email protected]* <[email protected]>> > *To: **[email protected]* <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Tuesday, January 31, 2017 7:26:12 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Or: Sally Yates > > "Never attribute to malice what can be explained by simple incompetence." > (or words to that effect) > > --*attributed to a bunch of people* > > > > Calling it a "shock event" assumes it was intentional. He gave an order > without prepping anyone for it, but it's just as likely he just didn't > think anybody would be confused or question whether it was legal. > > > > Just an opinion. > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "Faisal Imtiaz" <*[email protected]* > <[email protected]>> > > To: *[email protected]* <[email protected]> > > Sent: 1/30/2017 9:57:57 PM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Or: Sally Yates > > > > Thought provoking ! > > > > =========================== > > From Heather Richardson, professor of History at Boston College: > > "I don't like to talk about politics on Facebook-- political history is my > job, after all, and you are my friends-- but there is an important > non-partisan point to make today. > > What Bannon is doing, most dramatically with last night's ban on > immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries-- is creating what is > known as a "shock event." > > Such an event is unexpected and confusing and throws a society into chaos. > People scramble to react to the event, usually along some fault line that > those responsible for the event can widen by claiming that they alone know > how to restore order. > > When opponents speak out, the authors of the shock event call them > enemies. As society reels and tempers run high, those responsible for the > shock event perform a sleight of hand to achieve their real goal, a goal > they know to be hugely unpopular, but from which everyone has been > distracted as they fight over the initial event. There is no longer > concerted opposition to the real goal; opposition divides along the > partisan lines established by the shock event. > > Last night's Executive Order has all the hallmarks of a shock event. It > was not reviewed by any governmental agencies or lawyers before it was > released, and counterterrorism experts insist they did not ask for it. > People charged with enforcing it got no instructions about how to do so. > Courts immediately have declared parts of it unconstitutional, but border > police in some airports are refusing to stop enforcing it. > > Predictably, chaos has followed and tempers are hot. > > My point today is this: unless you are the person setting it up, it is in > no one's interest to play the shock event game. It is designed explicitly > to divide people who might otherwise come together so they cannot stand > against something its authors think they won't like. > > I don't know what Bannon is up to-- although I have some guesses-- but > because I know Bannon's ideas well, I am positive that there is not a > single person whom I consider a friend on either side of the aisle-- and my > friends range pretty widely-- who will benefit from whatever it is. > > If the shock event strategy works, though, many of you will blame each > other, rather than Bannon, for the fallout. And the country will have been > tricked into accepting their real goal. > > But because shock events destabilize a society, they can also be used > positively. We do not have to respond along old fault lines. We could just > as easily reorganize into a different pattern that threatens the people who > sparked the event. > > A successful shock event depends on speed and chaos because it requires > knee-jerk reactions so that people divide along established lines. This, > for example, is how Confederate leaders railroaded the initial southern > states out of the Union. > > If people realize they are being played, though, they can reach across old > lines and reorganize to challenge the leaders who are pulling the strings. > This was Lincoln's strategy when he joined together Whigs, Democrats, > Free-Soilers, anti-Nebraska voters, and nativists into the new Republican > Party to stand against the Slave Power. > > Five years before, such a coalition would have been unimaginable. Members > of those groups agreed on very little other than that they wanted all > Americans to have equal economic opportunity. Once they began to work > together to promote a fair economic system, though, they found much common > ground. They ended up rededicating the nation to a "government of the > people, by the people, and for the people." > > Confederate leaders and Lincoln both knew about the political potential of > a shock event. As we are in the midst of one, it seems worth noting that > Lincoln seemed to have the better idea about how to use it." > > COPY AND PASTE. DON"T "SHARE" > > ========================= > > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: *305 663 5518 x 232* <(305)%20663-5518> > > Help-desk: *(305)663-5518* <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email: > *[email protected]* <[email protected]> > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" <*[email protected]* > <[email protected]>> > *To: **[email protected]* <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Monday, January 30, 2017 9:36:57 PM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] Or: Sally Yates > > Commence the full stroke meltdown > > > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > >
