My personal belief is that Trump is the puppet of Steve Bannon. It would
explain a lot of things.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 1/31/2017 4:48 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
....The other thing is I've already seen multiple conspiracy theories
describing some elaborate scheme where Trump becomes a dictator.
We have to remember that when Obama was in office there were people
claiming that he was plotting to submit to the rule of new one world
government, or that he was pushing some secret "Muslim agenda", or
make himself a dictator, etc.
Conspiracy theories can be fun, but they usually can't be taken
seriously.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Faisal Imtiaz" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: 1/30/2017 9:57:57 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Or: Sally Yates
Thought provoking !
===========================
From Heather Richardson, professor of History at Boston College:
"I don't like to talk about politics on Facebook-- political history
is my job, after all, and you are my friends-- but there is an
important non-partisan point to make today.
What Bannon is doing, most dramatically with last night's ban on
immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries-- is creating
what is known as a "shock event."
Such an event is unexpected and confusing and throws a society into
chaos. People scramble to react to the event, usually along some
fault line that those responsible for the event can widen by claiming
that they alone know how to restore order.
When opponents speak out, the authors of the shock event call them
enemies. As society reels and tempers run high, those responsible for
the shock event perform a sleight of hand to achieve their real goal,
a goal they know to be hugely unpopular, but from which everyone has
been distracted as they fight over the initial event. There is no
longer concerted opposition to the real goal; opposition divides
along the partisan lines established by the shock event.
Last night's Executive Order has all the hallmarks of a shock event.
It was not reviewed by any governmental agencies or lawyers before it
was released, and counterterrorism experts insist they did not ask
for it. People charged with enforcing it got no instructions about
how to do so. Courts immediately have declared parts of it
unconstitutional, but border police in some airports are refusing to
stop enforcing it.
Predictably, chaos has followed and tempers are hot.
My point today is this: unless you are the person setting it up, it
is in no one's interest to play the shock event game. It is designed
explicitly to divide people who might otherwise come together so they
cannot stand against something its authors think they won't like.
I don't know what Bannon is up to-- although I have some guesses--
but because I know Bannon's ideas well, I am positive that there is
not a single person whom I consider a friend on either side of the
aisle-- and my friends range pretty widely-- who will benefit from
whatever it is.
If the shock event strategy works, though, many of you will blame
each other, rather than Bannon, for the fallout. And the country will
have been tricked into accepting their real goal.
But because shock events destabilize a society, they can also be used
positively. We do not have to respond along old fault lines. We could
just as easily reorganize into a different pattern that threatens the
people who sparked the event.
A successful shock event depends on speed and chaos because it
requires knee-jerk reactions so that people divide along established
lines. This, for example, is how Confederate leaders railroaded the
initial southern states out of the Union.
If people realize they are being played, though, they can reach
across old lines and reorganize to challenge the leaders who are
pulling the strings. This was Lincoln's strategy when he joined
together Whigs, Democrats, Free-Soilers, anti-Nebraska voters, and
nativists into the new Republican Party to stand against the Slave Power.
Five years before, such a coalition would have been unimaginable.
Members of those groups agreed on very little other than that they
wanted all Americans to have equal economic opportunity. Once they
began to work together to promote a fair economic system, though,
they found much common ground. They ended up rededicating the nation
to a "government of the people, by the people, and for the people."
Confederate leaders and Lincoln both knew about the political
potential of a shock event. As we are in the midst of one, it seems
worth noting that Lincoln seemed to have the better idea about how to
use it."
COPY AND PASTE. DON"T "SHARE"
=========================
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Monday, January 30, 2017 9:36:57 PM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] Or: Sally Yates
Commence the full stroke meltdown
