Clear sky atmospheric attenuation is definitely different at 40 GHz than 71-86 GHz. Might do a little better.
Doesn't appear to match any sort of known FCC band plan so it would probably require requesting a special temporary authority license on a link-by-link basis. With 2' antennas and 0.6 degree beam width the case could definitely be made that interfering with anything else would be highly unlikely. On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > After getting a chance to catch up, it looks like they offer that platform > in both 40 GHz and 70\80, so perhaps range is in best case on 40? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> > *To: *"Animal Farm" <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Monday, March 28, 2016 6:19:26 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Russians made a 10 Gbps radio? > > Wonder if Solectek will rebrand this one as well. 12 miles!!!! > On Mar 28, 2016 4:42 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> http://www.elva-1.com/news_events/a40107 >> >> http://www.elva-1.com/products/a40106 >> >> http://www.elva-1.com/data/files/Datasheets/2016_02_24_PPC-10G.pdf >> >> >> 2000 MHz wide channel and 256QAM for 10 Gbps in the FDD 71-86 GHz bands. >> Question is... What's the Rx level needed for that, and how quickly does >> it drop off with rain? >> >> >> >
