having a bullet pass millimeters from your end has that effect

On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 3:38 PM Chuck <[email protected]> wrote:

> Odd how differently we see the same thing.  I see him being less
> bombastic, tad bit more kind than before.
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 29, 2025, at 12:33 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 
>
> I disagree. His vocabulary has been getting noticably smaller with each
> passing year. His verbal gaffs are legend and getting worse.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 6/29/2025 11:21 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
> For me, the difference is that you could just watch Biden’s decline in
> real time.  Culminated in his debate performance.  Trump has always been a
> bit daffy.  I don’t see much of a downward a trend.
>
>
>
> *From:* AF [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Bill Prince
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 29, 2025 12:11 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Political
>
>
>
> It's been pretty obvious to me that the current president is a few
> sandwiches short of a picnic for about the last 10 years.
>
> Bet no one in his current circle will point that out, but a lot of people
> that used to be in his circle have.
>
>
>
> bp
>
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 6/29/2025 10:42 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
> Just finished Jake Tapper’s “Original Sin” book.  First half was
> interesting, second half gets pretty tedious.  Main takeaway for me:
> Nobody around Biden had the guts to tell him how the rest of the world was
> perceiving his cognitive state.  His wife was the main mechanic of the
> situation.  No cognitive tests.  I loved the part where George Clooney got
> really pissed at an event when Biden didn’t know him.  (Apparently they had
> been buds for a long time.)  In any event he really crapped the bed by
> running.  It appears things could have been massively different if there
> was a real primary for the Dems.   The book was sad and depressing IMHO.
> They did identify the group by name that internally was called “The
> Politburo” that essentially “handled” the president and had a large
> influence on everything.  But the book left the impression that they
> stopped short of just locking him away and being in control.  They tried to
> at least have the appearance of keeping him in the loop.  I would not
> recommend the book only because it is pretty boring and not really too much
> new info in there.  No bombshells.  Nothing scandalous other than a sad
> picture into a scene that was a bit worse than I suspected.
>
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to