Shhh!
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 29, 2025, at 4:46 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:



You’re just saying that because you travel overseas and you want to be able to come back.

 

Also, is the choice of words “bombastic” a pun in light of “bomb, bomb, bomb Iran”?

 

From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Chuck
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2025 3:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Political

 

Odd how differently we see the same thing.  I see him being less bombastic, tad bit more kind than before.

Sent from my iPhone



On Jun 29, 2025, at 12:33 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:



I disagree. His vocabulary has been getting noticably smaller with each passing year. His verbal gaffs are legend and getting worse.

 

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 6/29/2025 11:21 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

For me, the difference is that you could just watch Biden’s decline in real time.  Culminated in his debate performance.  Trump has always been a bit daffy.  I don’t see much of a downward a trend. 

 

From: AF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2025 12:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Political

 

It's been pretty obvious to me that the current president is a few sandwiches short of a picnic for about the last 10 years.

Bet no one in his current circle will point that out, but a lot of people that used to be in his circle have.

 

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 6/29/2025 10:42 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

Just finished Jake Tapper’s “Original Sin” book.  First half was interesting, second half gets pretty tedious.  Main takeaway for me:  Nobody around Biden had the guts to tell him how the rest of the world was perceiving his cognitive state.  His wife was the main mechanic of the situation.  No cognitive tests.  I loved the part where George Clooney got really pissed at an event when Biden didn’t know him.  (Apparently they had been buds for a long time.)  In any event he really crapped the bed by running.  It appears things could have been massively different if there was a real primary for the Dems.   The book was sad and depressing IMHO.  They did identify the group by name that internally was called “The Politburo” that essentially “handled” the president and had a large influence on everything.  But the book left the impression that they stopped short of just locking him away and being in control.  They tried to at least have the appearance of keeping him in the loop.  I would not recommend the book only because it is pretty boring and not really too much new info in there.  No bombshells.  Nothing scandalous other than a sad picture into a scene that was a bit worse than I suspected.






--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to