Sounds like what Chuck said, surges coming in via power down on the ground.

 

In any case, it might be advisable to use their special inductor cable, if only 
to avoid warranty disputes.  It could be like Ubiquiti blaming your cables for 
all problems if you don’t use their special “carrier grade” Cat5 cable and ends.

 

From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of castarritt
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2025 11:21 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tarana power cable with inductor

 

Tarana calls it an inductor.  It is fairly large, maybe a foot long, far more 
substantial than the typical ferrite core you might see on a dc power supply 
for consumer electronics for example.

>From their bulletin:

Issue 
 Based on the field data from customer site visits and Tarana’s internal 
testing it has been determined that only Transtector’s DC Defender PN: 
1101-1110 Model DC Defender 48-5 SPD is properly coordinated with the base node 
( BN). Other SPD’s used by customers may have response times too slow to 
protect the BN which can result in an improperly rated or mismatched SPD 
failing to activate in time. This could allow excessive surge energy to pass 
through, potentially causing damage to the BN. This impacts all the models of 
G1 base nodes.

Solution
A new “coordination power cable” that includes two series inductors embedded 
within the cable assembly connecting the SPD to the G1 BN. This additional 
series inductance effectively forces the external SPD solution into conduction 
sooner than the G1 BN, thereby allowing the external SPD to do more of the 
protection work during a surge event.




Towers get hit by lightning all the time without damage to the equipment if 
everything is built properly.  Not every lightning strike is equal though; some 
are a couple orders of magnitude more powerful than the average strike, and 
will produce damage.  Also, a direct hit to the equipment itself rather than 
the structure is obviously going to let the smoke out.

I've been to a site after a big hit.  The Verizon guy was also there and said 
his radio heads and his entire DC plant went up in smoke.  The tower lighting 
control box at the base of the tower was blown open with the lid bent from an 
arc flash inside it.  Our AC UPS in our cabinet at the base was fried, but all 
of our epmp APs on the tower were fine.

We had some Tarana BN failures early on until we settled on combining MOV SPDs 
on the hybrid cable and an SASD SPD as close to the radio as possible, and have 
been fine since.  If Tarana's new cable with inductors is a good idea, I think 
we should deploy it, it just seems like it's against what I've been taught 
about lightning protection, which is that you want everything to go up to the 
same potential, and back down again at the same time.  I'm no EE though, so was 
curious what yall thought.

 

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 6:46 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

By inductor do you mean a ferrite core?

 

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 6:01 PM castarritt <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Tarana is telling everyone to switch to a DC power cable for their radios that 
has a big inductor for surge suppression.  Is that really a good idea though?  
We use a Transtector DC Defender (SASD based) SPD at each BN, and they want the 
inductor in between the SPD and the radio.  If the only surge event that we 
needed to worry about was a voltage spike on the DC line, this might make 
sense, but that's not what happens when the tower is struck by lightning, 
right?  The whole structure and the radio chassis/ground is getting energized 
when the site is struck, and my understanding is that the DC lines need to be 
brought to the same potential by the SPDs to avoid damage.  Wouldn't putting an 
inductor on the DC line between the SPD and the radio be counter productive?

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to