Well said. And as for apple products, well it's very clear that Apple's
accessibility is very intuitive. So, people have to stretch their budget to
get those devices. No, I am not at all starting an Apple vs. Android
debate. Plus, one can live without these Apple products, but living without
assistive technologies is not possible.
And for the organizations distributing those tools, yes, they do. But then,
at the end, if anything fails, or any other problem, it's the beneficiaries
who suffer.
Just as I said before in my previous email, the ratio between cans and
cannots in our country is not that good yet. We have more cannots than
compared to cans. So, I think we have to think about them as well. Now, I
want to take a very basic, real-life example to illustrate why there should
be 0% GST for assistive devices. And, yes, I'll be neutral.

A Real-Life Example: Wheelchair vs. Television
Imagine a person with a severe physical disability who needs a specialized
wheelchair to be mobile. This isn't just a basic manual chair, but an
advanced, motorized one with custom supports. Let's say it costs ₹2,00,000.
When the government adds a 5% GST, the price increases by ₹10,000, bringing
the total to ₹2,10,000.
Now, let's compare this to an able-bodied person buying a luxury item, like
a high-end television for their home, also costing ₹2,00,000. They are also
paying GST. But the key difference is that the television is a want, and
the wheelchair is an absolute need.
Some might say, "Why can't the person with a disability just get a cheaper
model, like the person can get a cheaper TV?" This argument falls apart
very quickly. A person buying a TV has a choice; they can buy a cheaper
model or no TV at all without any real impact on their life. The person
with the disability doesn't have that luxury. The "cheaper" wheelchair
might not have the correct posture support to prevent health issues, or the
right motor to safely navigate their daily environment. Downgrading is not
an option; it's a sacrifice of a basic human function.
Then, they might say, "If a person is paying ₹2,00,000, can't they also pay
the extra ₹10,000?" Again, this misses the point entirely. The GST on the
wheelchair is not a one-time expense. People with disabilities face a host
of other unavoidable costs, like ongoing medical care, special transport,
and other tools. The 5% GST on the wheelchair is just one part of a
continuous and heavy financial burden. The real question is not whether
they can pay, but whether the government should be taxing a fundamental
necessity.
This isn't about giving a handout. It's about removing a financial barrier
that stands in the way of a person's ability to be independent, go to work,
and contribute to our country.

-- 
Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAJZg8ffetjeFCLcfO_qmoDNDP0tTXN%3D4-_KqrqTQm2GZ%3DFKJpA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to