This perspective is also fine, but there are apple and mac users also. And few 
days back, some questioned about reduced rates of IPhones were also come on the 
list. Those happily purchasing such devices should not speak these things. And 
if you are fine with devices, you should be OK with 5% GST. If government 
removes this slab, It's fine, but it doesn't, then I am with the government 
since this is not that an issue as it is shown to be. And second point is 
already well explained by Avichal, that there are plenty of organisations who 
distribute such accessibility things like softwares etc free of cost. Raisers 
of such questions smartly keep these things aside and ......... I won't speak 
further, it might perhaps take unnecessary turn to the discussion.
Yes, again, my last few cents are nothing wrong with 5% of GST.

Vande Mataram

----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mujtaba Merchant 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, September 5, 2025 7:08 PM
  Subject: RE: [AI] GST 2.0: A Reform that Still Taxes Disability


  Dear Avichal,

   

  It's not just about agreeing to disagree; it's about understanding the 
perspective of people with disabilities who face unique challenges and 
expenses. Many of us are not paid equally to our able-bodied counterparts, and 
assistive devices are essential, not luxuries. The tax burden adds to our 
already strained financial situation.

   

  You're right that some NGOs distribute assistive devices, but that's not a 
solution for everyone. Many people don't qualify for these distributions, and 
even when they do, it's often a temporary fix. We need systemic changes that 
make assistive technologies accessible and affordable for all.

   

  Moreover, we must also consider the burden borne by caregivers and families 
of people with disabilities. The financial strain of medical expenses and 
assistive technologies can be overwhelming, impacting not just the individual 
but the entire family. By reducing or exempting taxes on these essential 
devices, we can help alleviate some of the financial burdens and promote 
greater inclusivity and support.

   

  Furthermore, the employment rate for persons with disabilities in India is a 
significant concern. With nearly 64% of persons with disabilities not having 
jobs, it's crucial that we address the systemic barriers that prevent us from 
participating in the workforce. By providing accessible education, training, 
and employment opportunities, we can work towards a more inclusive society.

   

  Regarding your comment about "raving and ranting" and standing with a 
"begging bowl," I understand that you might not intend to come across as 
dismissive, but it's essential to recognize that advocacy is crucial for 
creating a more inclusive society. We're not asking for charity; we're seeking 
equal opportunities and access to resources that can help us thrive.

   

  You mentioned being happy to pay GST, citing its benefits for the country. 
While taxes do contribute to the country's development, it's essential to 
consider the disproportionate impact on people with disabilities. We face 
additional expenses for assistive devices, medical care, and other necessities. 
By exempting these devices from GST, the government can help level the playing 
field and promote inclusivity.

   

  Let's work together to raise awareness and push for policies that support 
people with disabilities. We can create a more equitable society where everyone 
has access to the resources they need to succeed.

   

  From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On 
Behalf Of Avichal Bhatnagar
  Sent: Friday, September 5, 2025 6:06 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [AI] GST 2.0: A Reform that Still Taxes Disability

   

  Hi mujtaba,

  Your opinion is well taken; we can always agree to disagree.

  The point is that in majority of the cases that I have come across, the 
assistive devices are distributed by different NGO's in bulk, thus making it 
free for the consumers.

  Therefore, the tax doesn't become a burden.

  Moreover, those who do not qualify in the ambit of distribution due to high 
family incomes can and must pay the tax.

   

  On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 5:59 PM Mujtaba Merchant <[email protected]> wrote:

    Dear Avichal,

     

    I'm shocked and disappointed by your reaction to Shruti's column about the 
GST on assistive devices. It's disheartening to see someone from our own 
community dismiss the struggles of others who are differently privileged. 
Assistive technologies like wheelchairs, hearing aids, and screen readers are 
not luxuries; they're necessities that can greatly improve the quality of life 
for people with disabilities.

     

    The argument that people should just "afford" these devices ignores the 
reality of economic disparities within the disability community. Many 
individuals and families struggle to make ends meet, and adding a tax burden 
only exacerbates their challenges.

     

    Rather than criticizing Shruti for advocating for change, perhaps we should 
be working together to raise awareness and push for policies that support 
inclusivity and accessibility. Let's focus on creating a more equitable society 
where everyone has access to the resources they need to thrive.

     

     

    From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On 
Behalf Of Avichal Bhatnagar
    Sent: Friday, September 5, 2025 5:33 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: [AI] GST 2.0: A Reform that Still Taxes Disability

     

    Unnecessary raving and ranting. Why do we, the disabled always have to 
stand with a begging bowl? I am more than happy to pay GST of five percent, as 
I know how this tax helps the country; the best example was the procurement of 
the air defence system, which greatly helped us in repelling all air 

     

    born attacks from Pakistan during operation Sindoor.

     

    On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 1:43 PM shruti pushkarna 
<[email protected]> wrote:

      Hi all, 

       

      The GST Council says the aim is to “lower the tax burden on common 
people, ease blocked working capital, and facilitate ease of doing business.” 
But where is the disabled common man or woman in this narrative? My mother, who 
has rheumatoid arthritis, has had 11 surgeries—some related to her condition, 
many not. And yet, every hospital admission turns into a battle with insurers 
who use her chronic illness as an excuse to delay or deny claims. Meanwhile, 
televisions and refrigerators get tax relief, but assistive devices like 
wheelchairs, hearing aids, or screen readers remain taxed as if they were 
luxuries. If GST 2.0 is “next-gen reform,” it is still a generation too late 
for disability households. 

       

      Read my full column on why the cost of living for persons with 
disabilities remains invisible in policy, and painfully expensive in practice. 

       

      
https://shruti-pushkarna.medium.com/gst-2-0-a-reform-that-still-taxes-disability-382768cfe485

       

      Best,

      Shruti

       

       

       

      -- 
      Disclaimer:
      1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of 
the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
       
      2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the 
mails sent through this mailing list..
       
       
      Search for old postings at:
      http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
      --- 
      You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
      To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].
      To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/7E3BBEEE-FF2E-4AA1-8CA6-CD0B1D558CC3%40gmail.com.




     

    -- 

    Avichal Bhatnagar
    Assistant professor at
    Department of English, Sri Guru Nanak Dev Khalsa College
    University of Delhi

    Doctoral research scholar at
    Department of humanities
    Delhi Technological University (formerly Delhi college of engineering)

    -- 
    Disclaimer:
    1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of 
the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
     
    2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails 
sent through this mailing list..
     
     
    Search for old postings at:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
    --- 
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].
    To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CADsKw8p%2BherS4ES1A0PDUvRrQN6xOLEyq%2BAiTz671TyTz7ZW-A%40mail.gmail.com.

    -- 
    Disclaimer:
    1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of 
the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
     
    2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails 
sent through this mailing list..
     
     
    Search for old postings at:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
    --- 
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].
    To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/003501dc1e60%24ab155d30%2401401790%24%40gmail.com.




   

  -- 

  Avichal Bhatnagar
  Assistant professor at
  Department of English, Sri Guru Nanak Dev Khalsa College
  University of Delhi

  Doctoral research scholar at
  Department of humanities
  Delhi Technological University (formerly Delhi college of engineering)

  -- 
  Disclaimer:
  1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
   
  2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails 
sent through this mailing list..
   
   
  Search for old postings at:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
  --- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].
  To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CADsKw8rLvrpQSLWhka5M%3DB92ErCsU5yfkEmVZSUveSmmrOVNDA%40mail.gmail.com.


  -- 
  Disclaimer:
  1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
   
  2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails 
sent through this mailing list..
   
   
  Search for old postings at:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
  --- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].
  To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/00d401dc1e6a%246bc9dbb0%24435d9310%24%40gmail.com.

-- 
Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/01b101dc1f0c%245995cb50%24c535d90a%40INBOOKX3Slim.

Reply via email to