Hi Scott, Why use IPv6 at all if you are using NAT, why not just use IPv4?
I think it's good if Cisco don't support IPv6 NAT operations ;) Tim On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 01:44:22PM -0500, Scott Nelson wrote: > Can NAT be setup to NAT ipv6 to ipv6 from one interface to the other? > > ISP1 ISP2 ISP3 > | | | > router > | | > Client/Network connections > > > I want to statically route all of ISP 2 and ISP 3 network ranges to them > via their connections while using ISP's 1 network range for everything else. > ISP1, 2 and 3 are tunnels. Client/Network connections are and fast ethernet > and a 10Mb ethernet. > > BGP would be great except that I can't get anyone to call me back so, I am > exploring this option while I am waiting for them to call ( if ever ). > Free tunnels are great but.............. ;-) > > Anyway, I have been working on it for a couple of days now and can't seem to > get this working. > So, what I need is to NAT overload ISP2 and ISP3 from my network ranges. > That's the part that I am having an issue with. > Routing is already pushing the traffic for those networks out the correct > tunnels via static route to each tunnel. > > Anybody doing IPv6 NAT overload via Cisco or have an idea how to get this > working? > > TIA > > Scotty > > > _______________________________________________ > 6bone mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone -- Tim _______________________________________________ 6bone mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone
