> I'm interested in creating a site for zeromq-based specifications in the same > style and format of rfc.zeromq.org but which can not be published in that > repository because the maintainer finds them objectionable.
The RFC repository follows the C4 process. Maintainers aren't supposed to pass value judgments on correct patches. If they disagree they should follow up with their own patches. On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 8:33 AM Justus Ranvier <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you. Hugo looks like a really great tool. > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 12:52 AM Kevin Sapper <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Justus, >> it's build with hugo and hosted on Netlify. >> >> //Kevin >> >> Justus Ranvier <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa., 25. Nov. 2023, >> 03:15: >>> >>> I'm interested in creating a site for zeromq-based specifications in the >>> same style and format of rfc.zeromq.org but which can not be published in >>> that repository because the maintainer finds them objectionable. >>> >>> Can anyone shed some light on what software is used to render that site? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
