Is there anything you could contribute to the documentation which would
have helped you?
Rg,
Arnaud
On 26/03/2023 19:35, joec infoark.com wrote:
Well...spent a bit more time screwing around with it...and voila..I
got it working!
Very happy about this, but not exactly sure why I had an issue...I
started and stopped TIPC several times,,,each trying different
addressing.
Eventually, I dropped back to the defaults suggessted in the programs
themselves (which I had previously tried and failed)...and it worked.
I had done some more research on the mailing lists about TIPC...still
trying to grasp how the domain (@n.n.n) is used for though.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* joec infoark.com
*Sent:* Sunday, March 26, 2023 11:06 AM
*To:* [email protected] <[email protected]>
*Subject:* TIPC support broken ???
Am new to zeromq and am evaluating using it for a new upcoming TIPC
project. I built the samples from
https://gist.github.com/hintjens/7335589, then set it up accordingly.
Screwed around with it for a several hours but could never get it to work.
After reviewing the zmq TIPC logic, it seems since the TIPC 2 changes
several years ago, it appears that TIPC features & addressing have
changed considerably. And despite the TIPC maintainers efforts to
provide backward compatibility, zmq likely needs some changes to use
the current version of TIPC today?
I'd like to be wrong about this, and hope someone might be able to
confirm or deny the above?
Does anyone know of anyone currently using ZeroMQ w/TIPC transport?
Thanks in advance.
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
