On 12/19/22 22:51, Arnaud Loonstra wrote:
Can't you us the full URL or am I missing something here?
I could. Visually I like the short syntax of number/name that the
specification in the repo use but if I go with my own numbering scheme
then I need some way to resolve collisions.
> The site collects more then libzmq. It's not libzmq specific.
My project is a multi-blockchain client library and what I'm
implementing now is a zeromq-based transport that will let the library
multiplex the native p2p protocol messages for more than one blockchain
over a single tcp port.
Then I expect to extend that protocol with zeromq-specific replacements
for many of the native messages.
All these specifications should be made public in a suitable way. In
total there might be one or two dozen of them at the end of this project
which is why I was initially thinking they should be in their own
"namespace", but if that kind of thing fits in rfc.zeromq.org then I
could publish them there as well.
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
