Brett Viren <[email protected]> wrote: > And, what I *really* need is the Majordomo pattern but with > CLIENT/SERVER for thread-safety.
Pardon if I'm not quite following here, but isn't every ZeroMQ "message" an atomic operation already? In terms of a protocol library what more are you expecting in providing thread safety? Can't the rest be handled with a minor wrapper if even that much is necessary? (multi-thread apps probably already have some mechanisms built in but I digress...) Thanks, Robert E.
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
