Hi Kevin, Kevin Sapper <[email protected]> writes:
> I think we need for zproto to be aware of zproject. Meaning if there's > an api file for a class we should not generate and override the > zproject headers. > > Maybe instead of generating header files zproto could generate api > files. That way we avoid conflicts with zproject in regards to the > header files. I agree with the first and think the second is a good idea. But, in my case the project does not don't have API files for the zproto classes. Baring an API file, I think zproject should be modified to NOT generate header/source if a <model> exists for a CLASS. That is <model> would indicate header/source generation is delegated to something other than project.xml. Would this be consistent with the intended meaning of the <model> tag? Would it break any existing packages or documentation if zproject GSL modified to act this way? -Brett.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
