Which binding are you using? Can you link to the steerable proxy in question?
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:36 AM Ernest Zed <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm running performance tests on our system and I see that our server side > which uses back/front end sockets consumes much of the CPU time in the > steerable proxy. Once I switch to regular proxy, things look better. Is > steerable proxy known as performance bottleneck/big cpu consumer? > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
