On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 10:10 +0100, Michal Vyskocil wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for proposal, just gave my opinions to gh.
Can't see them on the PR? > Are you going to extend C4 for the CI and other systems criteria? > See https://github.com/zeromq/czmq/issues/1837 PRs welcome :-) > Michal > > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Luca Boccassi <[email protected] > om> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We have been using the draft/stable status for API for a few years > > now, > > but the exact requirements for a transition of status have never > > been > > finalised. > > > > I therefore propose the following amendments to the C4 RFC: > > > > https://github.com/zeromq/rfc/pull/128/commits/ > > ac42b46a2acdd34e473a73a43e2b5b5724216390 > > > > Please provide comments/acks/nacks on the PR: > > > > https://github.com/zeromq/rfc/pull/128 > > > > -- > > Kind regards, > > Luca Boccassi > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
