of course- if i was smart, i would have looked at some more of the examples first:
https://github.com/zeromq/czmq/blob/master/bindings/python/test.py#L40 i was mistaken that project.xml DID have it as an <actor/> which means the start function was defined in _prelude.h, was just a matter of finding that and figuring out how to access it through the python layer.. however, i started re-writing a bit of it similar to how zyre_node_t, zgossip_t, etc [and others] are setup- to see what it’d look like and see how the higher level bindings reacted towards it. it *seems* like it would transition smoothly and provide some easier access functions to the higher level bindings, instead of having to pass strings back and forth. not that it’s a big deal either way- but seems like it’d be more consistent with the rest of the APIs (?) just a matter if others have found really big show stoppers in teh past- or “no dummy don’t do that cause blah”. don’t wanna mess up zauth for people here.. (thinking out-loud) > On Sep 20, 2017, at 6:13 PM, Luca Boccassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think it's simply never been converted, IIRC it predates the zproject > api models. There are other classes as well that haven't been ported. > If you send a PR to add api/zauth we'll merge it. -- wes wesyoung.me
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
