Hi, my setup looks like this, where the number of instances is setup using docker swarm scaling https://docs.docker.com/engine/swarm/swarm-tutorial/scale-service/ Redis <-> db_instances <-> scheduler <-> worker Every instance runs inside a docker container and at the moment there is only one redis instance. I intend to move to a redis cluster setup at some point. I am using db_instances:router <-> scheduler:dealer scheduler:router <-> worker:dealer socket setup. Currently I connect the dealer sockets like this tcp://scheduler:5000, and docker swarm automatically directs the message to one out of the set of scaled scheduler services. It is possible to connect directly to one instance of scheduler, tcp://scheduler.1:5000 with that would i t make sense to have one socket per connected service instance? And then using a LRU scheduling approach to direct my requests? I hope that my setup became clearer. Thanks Gesendet: Sonntag, 02. Juli 2017 um 12:00 Uhr Von: [email protected] An: [email protected] Betreff: zeromq-dev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 2 Send zeromq-dev mailing list submissions to [email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of zeromq-dev digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: [ANN] JeroMQ 0.4.2 - A pure Java clone of libzmq (Trevor Bernard) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 08:49:03 -0400 From: Trevor Bernard <[email protected]> To: ZeroMQ development list <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] [ANN] JeroMQ 0.4.2 - A pure Java clone of libzmq Message-ID: <CAGGWQ++59w+ioJrv5DJmiVn2Or5TQJ5yXv8R+OOFWWGukOB6=a...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Yes, I found a pure Java port of NaCl with a good license. On Jul 1, 2017 9:58 AM, "Doron Somech" <[email protected]> wrote: Amazing, I want to do that for NetMQ for a long time. Does the libsodium implementation is also pure Java? On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Luca Boccassi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 09:20 -0400, Trevor Bernard wrote: > > > Is the CURVE implementation fully inter-operable with libzmq? > > > > Yup, it's fully interoperable. > > Fantastic, thanks! > > -- > Kind regards, > Luca Boccassi > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev[https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev] > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev[https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170701/35025fe7/attachment-0001.html[https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20170701/35025fe7/attachment-0001.html]> ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev[https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev] ------------------------------ End of zeromq-dev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 2 ***************************************** _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
