I just got a reply from MailmanLists support saying they plan to introduce Mailman 3 this year, without giving a date, though.
-- Sent on the move. Von unterwegs gesendet. > Am 19.04.2016 um 13:54 schrieb Brian Knox <[email protected]>: > > Excellent. +1 for staying with mailman then. > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Kevin Sapper <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Staying with Mailman is indeed the better choice. Even though I like Google >> groups they don't have an option the migrate away from it which is a deal >> breaker IMO. >> Regarding helping out Ewen I gladly volunteer. >> >> 2016-04-19 5:30 GMT+02:00 Indradhanush Gupta <[email protected]>: >>> >>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> OK, we need a small set of admins, who can work with my friend Ewen >>>> McNeill, who has kept archives over the years, to migrate to mailmanlists >>>> and then manage the lists (zeromq-announce is #2). Justin, it's your baby. >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>> >>> This is great. I'd like to volunteer if you need an extra hand. >>> >>> >>>> On 19 Apr 2016 05:10, "Pieter Hintjens" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Justin, that is a great proposal, thank you for finding it. I'd prefer >>>> keeping mailman, for familiarity. >>>> >>>> On 19 Apr 2016 04:36, "Justin Karneges" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hey folks, >>>>> >>>>> I spoke with MailmanLists and they are willing to host the ZeroMQ >>>>> mailing list for free. All they ask for is a link on the mailing list >>>>> page. If you'd prefer the list remain Mailman-based and simply don't >>>>> want to host it, then I'd say this is the best the way to go. They'll >>>>> import archives too. >>>>> >>>>> Re: MailmanLists vs. dotList (aka Mailmanhost), both appear to be >>>>> Mailman hosting experts with a long lives (8 years and 11 years, >>>>> respectively). Other than cost, it's hard to say on the outside which >>>>> one is better, but as a customer of MailmanLists I can vouch for their >>>>> helpful support. MailmanLists also claims to be a financial contributor >>>>> to the FSF which is pretty cool. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016, at 05:21 PM, c wrote: >>>>> > Jim Idle <[email protected]> writes: >>>>> > >>>>> > I'm a nay on Google Groups. As seen with SourceForge, sometimes the >>>>> > priorities of companies change. This is especially true for a publically >>>>> > traded company. >>>>> > >>>>> > The price points of https://www.mailmanhost.com/pricing/ seem better >>>>> > than http://www.mailmanlists.net/ but I have no personal experience with >>>>> > either. >>>>> > >>>>> > > You just add your email address to the google list - you don't >>>>> > > actually need a Google account. Thre is really no difference to now. >>>>> > >>>>> > In my experience list maintainers end up needing to enable the Google >>>>> > Account >>>>> > requirement on their groups to combat spam. >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > zeromq-dev mailing list >>>>> > [email protected] >>>>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Indradhanush Gupta >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
