I think at some stage we'll change COSS to reflect the more modern
approach we use in ZeroMQ with C4.1. The state flow is good and works,
but the edit/contribution process could be simpler.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've pushed small edits for this.
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Tom Quarendon
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm certainly happy with that definition, it's what I've implemented.
>> Pieter, my understanding of the COSS process is that given that you are the 
>> Editor of the spec, you have to make the mods? Oh, actually you are credited 
>> as "contributor", with no Editor. What does COSS process say happens in that 
>> situation :-) I think you are probably de facto Editor.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pieter Hintjens
>> Sent: 02 February 2016 09:15
>> To: ZeroMQ development list <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] XRAP clarification: Are parameters/metadata case 
>> sensitive?
>>
>> ZMTP uses case-insensitive metadata names. I suggest we use the same 
>> convention.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tom Quarendon <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> It’s not specified in the XRAP specification whether or not the names
>>> in the parameter hash, or the returned metadata hash are case sensitive or 
>>> not.
>>>
>>> When actually attempting to implement this, I think this is
>>> information that is required.
>>>
>>> In HTTP, header fields are case insensitive. In HTTP/2 I believe it
>>> even goes as far as to say that the header names have to be passed in lower 
>>> case.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don’t know what would be most appropriate in this circumstance, I
>>> think that having them case insensitive, or equivalently always passed
>>> in lower case, would be most sensible.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Assuming concensus is reached, can the spec be edited to reflect?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to