Hi Michel, That's very helpful, it sounds like generating cffi bindings with cproject is the way to go then.
Thank you, Aaron On 25 January 2016 at 14:02, Michel Pelletier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Aaron Sokoloski <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> >> Maybe the right thing to do is to change zproject to also generate a CFFI >> version of the python bindings. Then the malamute CFFI bindings could >> interact with pyczmq easily. However, this is a bit more work so I wanted >> to get people's thoughts first. >> > > Hi Aaron, I wrote the pyczmq cffi bindings, and haven't looked at them in > some time. Sorry if they have caused you some confusion. I always assumed > that at some point zproject generation would replace them as hand > maintaining the bindings is a pain as evidenced by the fact that I haven't > done it :) So, although I think it's more work, generating the bindings > automatically, as you sugguest here, I do think is the right approach. > CFFI is a bit more of a distribution pain than ctypes, but I think provides > a nicer model, in the end it probably won't matter much to users which one > is used. > > -Michel > > >> >> Cheers, >> Aaron >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
