Minor RHEL releases of the same major are API/ABI compatible, so there is no 
reason staying with RHEL 5.3. Further, if you need Red Hat support, they will 
tell you to use the latest minor release of the major in order to avoid wasting 
time on already corrected issues.  

Cheers, 

-- 
Justin Cook


On Wednesday, 8 August 2012 at 15:20, andrea crotti wrote:

> 2012/8/8 Justin Cook <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>:
> > If it fails to build you are not installing it, but trying to build from 
> > source? If so, try the latest RHEL5. 5.3 is quite old.
> > 
> > --
> > Justin Cook
> > 
> > 
> > On Wednesday, 8 August 2012 at 14:04, andrea crotti wrote:
> > 
> > > I tried to install libzmq (both 3.2 and 2.2) on Red Hat 5.3, and it
> > > fails to build because the autoconf version is too old.
> > > 
> > > I could still try to install locally a newer copy of the autotools, but
> > > is then going to work or is just not compatible?
> > > Aren't there binary packages somewhere?
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> 
> 
> 
> Yes sure I was trying to build it, also because I didn't find any
> binaries.. So is it supposed to work or should I push for an upgrade
> on these machines (which might never come)?
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev



_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to