On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:33:32 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> So from IRC it sounds like the post-op damage reporting code isn't too > horrible after all. If you're OK with changing damageext to use the > post-op reporting, please add a Reviewed-by and I'll send a pull > request. Yeah, it looks like the best solution for 1.9 anyway. Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]> (sorry, busy at debconf this week). -- [email protected]
pgp6t9x22BIuP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: [email protected]
