On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 04:20:01 -0400 (EDT), Thomas Dickey <[email protected]> wrote:
> Xorg isn't a _technical_ organization. > It is a political organzation, which lacks focus. Thomas -- you're welcome to work on stuff wherever you like; I'm certainly happy that you're continuing to maintain xterm and luit and encourage you to continue doing so. I don't see this as an X.org issue though, which, as you point out, is largely a political organization. Many of the current X developers use freedesktop.org to collaborate on development, sharing git repositories, the bugzilla database and mailing lists there. Freedesktop.org also hosts numerous other projects related in some way to the overall desktop environment. Each project on fd.o is owned by the developers working on that project. If you would like to use that infrastructure in some way to help develop xterm and/or luit, you'd be welcome to do so. If not, I think we should remove the stale luit bits from fd.o and make sure people know where the 'real' bits live, as we've already done with xterm. -- [email protected]
pgpaFX3aOw5q0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: [email protected]
