I recently tried to do this. I wish I had read your posts on this first!.
But now I have a build that "nearly" works and would greatly appreciate if you
can offer any hints on how to make it work completely, or if the advice should
be to throw away and start again. Please bear with me.
For various reasons (which I can explain but may not be relevant) I decided to
try to build Xorg from source, on a system which was originally Fedora Core 6
and since then upgraded slightly. The objective was to be able to use an
"nv" driver on my graphics device (NVIDIA FX570M) without having to use
nvidia's own nvidia driver which is problematic (and latest version doesn't
work at all)
I took the tarballs from
http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/x.org/X11R7.4/src/everything/, followed the
instructions in the Modular Tree developers Guide as best as I could, and after
a bit of a struggle, ended up with an Xserver and apps etc that "almost" works
fine.
I built into a prefix of <not_/usr>/xorg_modular as per the Guide and then set
up my PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH and PKG_CONFIG_PATH all with that (with appropriate
suffix) at the front, and that seems to work.
I also ensured that the new xfs, not the old one, is running before I start X.
The Xserver works and the graphics device (an NVIDIA FX570M with driver nv) and
keyboard and mouse all work.
But my fonts are not working perfectly. I am not sure of exactly the
complete list of what is wrong but one obvious problem is that for every app
that uses gtk2, all text is empty-boxes. For example using metacity window
manager, all window borders show empty-box titles. Other simple apps such as
xterm are fine. and one app that uses freetype but not gtk (wine) also
works fine. I have also sometimes seen one application, emacs, fail with
"font xxxx not defined' even though xlsfonts -fn xxxx lists it. But I think
that problem "went away" or I can't make it happen consistently.
I am using the separate freetype2 (in /usr/local) but have done that on other
system with no problems.
I don't see any relevant errors in the Xorg.0.log although there is one that
may be but I don't know what to about it if anything :
(EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /mnt/ahbakup/xorg_modular/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so
failed (/mnt/ahbakup/xorg_modular/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory)
(EE) GLX: could not load software renderer
But I don't need GL/dri I don't think these window managers are using it
(are they)?
I am really looking for some basic hints :
. is the tarball method supported or has it become obsolete and I should
try git? I did find a confusing number of missing and multiple-version
packages kicking around and may have mixed levels although no build errors
eventually.
(although I also noticed that my xfs font server was built without
FONTCACHE defined whereas the libXFont was built with it defined, so xfs didn't
understand the font-cache entries in the fs/config so I commented those out)
. does anyone recognize this problem and have any suggestion for what to
check?
. I noticed a config option on the xserver for --enable-builtin-fonts -
and see that on another newer xorg the Xorg.0.log says it is using builtin
fonts. Might this be an answer?
. of course I can send xorg.conf, Xorg.0.log, build output, etc if anyone
suggests what might be relevant
. or should I throw this build away and start again?
Thanks for any help ...
John
_________________________________________________________________
Reinvent how you stay in touch with the new Windows Live Messenger.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9650731_______________________________________________
xorg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
