2009/1/31 Bryce Harrington <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:29:49PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: >> > $ glxgears >> > Failed to initialize TTM buffer manager. Falling back to classic. >> > 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.884 FPS >> > 299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.621 FPS >> > 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.818 FPS >> >> glxgears is not a benchmark. >> >> We sync to vblank because running glxgears at 1000fps is dumb. > > I am going to go out on a limb and guess we're going to see a crapload > of reports of "performance regression" due to reduced glxgears frame > rates.
What was the purpose in this change? I have never heard a user complain that glxgears is running too fast, and that they want it to vsync. What's the use case of this change exactly? John _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
