On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 06:45:28PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 10:26 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Yeah, Xnest and Xdmx are broken, sorry. That being said, we've talked a > > lot about just deleting Xnest in favour of Xephyr: anyone got any > > compelling counter-arguments? > > Pretty sure the compelling argument was that Xnest would pass through > requests so that you got acceleration from your host server. Except > that it doesn't support modern extensions, so you get no acceleration > and clients shaking their fists at you instead. I haven't heard of any > use for it as a debugging platform, either. > > Nuke away, in my opinion.
Yep. Just got to add full Xnest command-line compatibility, then it's gone. Cheers, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
