Bill Crawford wrote: > On Wednesday 21 January 2009 11:13:20 Frank de Lange wrote: > >> Looks to me like X does not use more than 1.7% of CPU so that is not out >> of the ordinary. To find out more about where the memory goes you can >> install xrestop to see if something leaks somewhere. Either run it >> interactivally and watch the numbers or run it in batch mode (-b) and >> redirect the output to a file. You might be able to find the culprit >> that way. > > The biiiig number on the far right before the command shows the time used > since > the process started, and it's much bigger for the X process than his number > cruncher, and this is what he's bothered about. The 1.7% figure is only about > the CPU use at around the time he ran "top" ... >
You mean that funnily formatted big number? I sort of ignored it as it looks like something went wrong copying it to the message. If it *really* means X has been running > 1000 minutes then yes, something is wrong. I'd say try another driver, VESA comes to mind... _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
