Keith Packard wrote: >> Do you think the 945 chipset is just too slow to rotate a 1920x1200 >> screen? > > One thing that may improve performance a bit is when we get tiling > support for the displayed buffer. That work requires some additional > kernel infrastructure to manage the 'fence' registers which are > responsible for linearizing tiled regions for software rendering code. > > You might try 16bpp instead of 32bpp; it won't look as good, but it > should go faster.
Tried that: 85 fps in normal mode, 27 fps for left-rotation. Would a board with a 965GM chipset fare much better, you think? I haven't seen many small form-factor embedded boards with that chipset yet, unfortunately. Cheers, Rob _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
