Roland Mainz wrote: > Erm... I strongly suggest not trying that. This quickly runs into a vey > special hell where each platform interprets IEEE754-1985 in it's own > subtle way (IEEE754-2008 will clean this partially up but it will take > some years until we see support for this). In the best case it works, in > the worst case you'll get corrupt data, differenly sized float types or > a SIGFPE (for example some platforms have nasty behaviour for payloads > within NaN values) ... Well, originally I treated inf/NaN as error anyway. For non-inf/NaN, I could google up the ususal reproducability deficiencies, but I found no binary compatibility complaints.
Maybe you can give some additional references? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
