2008/12/2 Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 01:48:31PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> I don't know what our documentation licensing stance is. MIT would keep >> things simple, but I don't know if it's appropriate for docs. > What're our options? GFDL is out as DFSG-incompatible. GFDL is an unspeakable Cthulhu-grade horror if you go anywhere deeper than the surface. It's amazing how little types of stuff it actually makes sense from; no-one knows what the hell would happen in a serious courtroom stoush given the already vast disparity between the letter of the license and widespread practice. Learn from Wikipedia's HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE MISTAKE. Don't go there. Whatever you do. - d. _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
