Hi Jamey, > I'm sorry too: I used an overly grumpy tone in my last mail. I > should have known git would make the merge easy to do. :-) > Tinderbox builds should be passing again now.
Yep, they're passing again, thanks: http://tinderbox.x.org/ >> I'll be more patient about build breakage in future. (Maybe we >> could set up a process for announcing a temporary breakage to the >> list?) > You know, I really should have announced that. You're right. :-) It > didn't occur to me that people might be building from git on such a > regular basis that anyone would notice. My bad. :-) Hopefully it's > a rare enough thing to not need a special process though... Agreed. > It's good to see that there's an X.org Tinderbox; I knew anholt set > one up years ago but I didn't think there was one still going. Is > there room in there to run libxcb's test suite, pathetic as it is? > At top level, just run `make check`. Thanks, added the "make check" test. I don't know if you plan to have the test suite launch X clients in the future, but I added it to the set of tests that is run against the newly-built libraries/server/drivers at the end of every tinderbox build, so launching clients will work if you want to. Here's the current set of tests used after every build run: xcb x11perf rendercheck cairotest cairoperf Here are the latest test results for the "construct" tinderbox machine: http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2008-11-05-0005/ (Hm, it says "0 tests passed" for libxcb; any idea what's up with that?) > Running the X Test Suite would be awesome too. I'll take a look at the X Test Suite -- I haven't used it before. If there are any other suggestions for test programs to run against new builds of servers/drivers, I'd be happy to hear those too. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
