Now that we've switched to the new xorgproto repo, should we add notices to
the configure.ac of the old *proto repo like we've done for abandoned drivers
to tell people who don't follow our mailing lists to switch over to it?
-alan-
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [Bug 105287] X server requires "randrproto >= 1.6.0", but git
head of
randrproto is still at 1.5.0
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:54 +0000
From: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Eero Tamminen <mailto:[email protected]> changed bug 105287
<https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105287>
What Removed Added
Status RESOLVED VERIFIED
URL
https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2018-February/002835.html
*Comment # 2 <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105287#c2> on bug
105287 <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105287> from Eero Tamminen
<mailto:[email protected]> *
I see. Thanks.
Having pointer in randrproto git to newly required xorgproto (and nothing
else), would have been helpful.
Xserver depending on specific version of xorgproto (which provides now all
these headers), instead of there being separate pgkconfig file & check for each
of the headers, would IMHO make this transition a lot clearer to everybody who
doesn't follow X mailing lists.
(Google searches on randrproto 1.6 returning hits to Keith's patches, which
update randrproto to 1.6.0 instead of xorgproto, does not help.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this mail because:
* You are the assignee for the bug.
* You are the QA Contact for the bug.
_______________________________________________
xorg-team mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-team
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
