Giuseppe Bilotta <[email protected]> writes: > Joking aside, this does mean that strtod could be a good option when > parsing the single value. The check would be more verbose though, so I > think I'll stick with sscanf.
Sure, your sscanf pattern is pretty simple to understand. > I'll add the positive check for both scale and gamma and respin the patch. Thanks. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
