On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Adam Jackson <a...@nwnk.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 11:57 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> >> wrote: >> > From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com> >> > >> > The lower layers also do this, but no damage may be reported there, >> > since we unwrap before calling down. >> > >> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99220 >> > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com> >> >> Makes sense to me. >> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> > > Mmm. I might like the original patch better, I think I'd rather have > composite be aware of how damage works than damage be aware of every > possible way a caller might abuse it. So I reserve the right to flip > this back the other way at some point in the future, if we ever get > around to dix-level damage.
No objections from me. I don't have a strong preference. Alex > > But this does work, and I do give preference to patches that other > people review instead of things I have to review as the last resort, > so, merged: > > remote: I: patch #137290 updated using rev > 38696ea56854e055c31bd2730adfc7c39aa115b0. > remote: I: 1 patch(es) updated to state Accepted. > To ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/xserver > 1c78bec..38696ea master -> master > > - ajax _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
