On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 18:32:27 +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 08:54:47AM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:53:46AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 15:08:13 +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > > > > > > We had HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE checks, but no such macros were ever > > > > defined anywhere. This commit makes it so that this macro is defined if > > > > the posix_fallocate is detected during configure. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <[email protected]> > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > any reason not to do the check unconditionally and put the define in > > > dix-config.h? > > > > The only reason is that the function checked is only used by the > > xwayland ddx. It could just as well be added to dix-config.h if that is > > preferred. > > So any opinions regarding this? Should the macro be moved ddx/ or not? > I still think putting it in dix-config is simpler and I can't think of any downsides.
Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
