On 10 February 2016 at 17:08, Kristian Høgsberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 5 February 2016 at 08:42, Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> umm, do we really want to add even more uses of the Mesa-private wl_drm >>> protocol outside of Mesa? Though it seems that ship sailed a long time >>> ago. >>> >>> Should we just bite the bullet, and have Mesa install drm.xml for >>> public consumption? Or move drm.xml to wayland-protocols.git? >>> >>> I thought all that was a Bad Idea(tm). >>> >> If we consider that distributing the protocol for public consumption >> is OK, please use wayland-protocols.git. Keeping it in mesa will lead >> to nasty circular dependencies. > > I think we should. It's pretty much the equivalent of dri2proto and > it's useful for projects such as libva as well.
Why not a stabliised zlinux_dmabuf instead? The only thing I can really say against it is that it lacks FB modifier support, but, well, so does wl_drm (and gbm, which means you can't extract multi-plane buffers to overlays, or particularly sensibly to non-TEXTURE_EXTERNAL_OES GL ...). Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
