On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 08:36 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:24:39AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Yes, but the xorg_list_for_each_entry macro needs the same > > treatment. > > With that, > > > > Acked-by: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> > > Thanks, new version attached.
remote: I: patch #68368 updated using rev a221d4737c167589da44595c795d54f2c36b439a. remote: I: 1 patch(es) updated to state Accepted. To ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/xserver f359391..a221d47 master -> master If it's not too much trouble, please use git-send-email --in-reply-to for followup patches like this. Patchwork gets a little confused by attachments and it means I have to manually edit the commit message to make it look reasonable. Alternatively, if someone wanted to fix patchwork for that case, I've filed an issue for it here: https://github.com/dlespiau/patchwork/issues/123 - ajax _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
