On 29/07/2014 20:00, Adam Jackson wrote:
If the linux vm86 backend changes look somewhat horrifying to you,
that's because you have taste.
+static Bool
+readLegacy(struct pci_device *dev, unsigned char *buf, int base, int len)
+{
+ void *map;
+
+ if (!pci_device_map_legacy(dev, base, len, 0, &map))
+ return FALSE;
+
+ memcpy(buf, map, len);
+ pci_device_unmap_legacy(dev, man, len);
I'm guessing 'map' is meant here, if anyone was actually using this :)
From 98f98f546805e1fee2512ab074dcf265d2c3da4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon TURNEY <jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 11:24:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix build on linux with --with-int10=vm86
Signed-off-by: Jon TURNEY <jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk>
---
hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/int10/linux.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/int10/linux.c
b/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/int10/linux.c
index 5acb6e4..0234a19 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/int10/linux.c
+++ b/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/int10/linux.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ readLegacy(struct pci_device *dev, unsigned char *buf, int
base, int len)
return FALSE;
memcpy(buf, map, len);
- pci_device_unmap_legacy(dev, man, len);
+ pci_device_unmap_legacy(dev, map, len);
return TRUE;
}
--
2.0.5
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
