On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:08:09AM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > No, that patch looks like a hack. It's attempting to do the same as > Alan's patch, but Alan's patch, minus the incorrect comment, is better > believable. That is, of course, assuming someone has tested it and > confirmed that it fixes the problem.
Well, I've tried to get Michael to test Alan's patch, but he seems to have mislaid his glint hardware. :( Not sure what the best way to proceed is in this case. Thomas _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
